فاعلية برنامج تدريبي موجه قائم على بحوث الفعل لتنمية الفهم الجمالي و متطلبات التعليم من أجل التنمية المستدامة لدى معلمي البيولوجي بالمرحلة الثانوية
الملخص
ملخص البحث: يهدف البحث الحالي إلى تعرف فاعلية برنامج تدريبي موجه قائم على بحوث الفعل في ضوء أبعاد الفهم الجمالي ومتطلبات التعليم من أجل التنمية المستدامة لمعلمي البيولوجي بالمرحلة الثانوية بإحدى المدارس الدولية بمصر، وتمثلت مشكلة البحث في "ضعف المهارات الأدائية اللازمة لمتطلبات الفهم الجمالي والتعليم من أجل التنمية المستدامة لدى معلمي البيولوجي" وفقًا لتطبيق أدوات البحث على عينة تتكون من (50) من معلمي البيولوجي في المدارس اللغات والدولية بمصر، مما أدى إلى ضعف تدريس البيولوجي في ضوء أبعاد الفهم الجمالي ومتطلبات التنمية المستدامة كأحد المعايير الدولية لتدريس العلوم. وللتغلب على هذه المشكلة تم بناء قائمة بالمهارات الأدائية اللازمة للفهم الجمالي والتربية من أجل التنمية المستدامة، ثم بناء برنامج تدريبي بنظام بحوث الفعل لمعلمي البيولوجي في ضوء هذه المهارات. كما تم إعداد أدوات البحث والمتمثلة في محتوى البرنامج التدريبي، وأدوات القياس الكيفية والكمية وهي على التوالي: (1-خريطة ذهنية: أداة كيفية ذات أبعاد قابلة للقياس لمدى إلمام المعلمين بأبعاد الفهم الجمالي ومفاهيمه وعلاقته بمتطلبات التعليم من أجل التنمية المستدامة. 2-نموذج التعلم القائم على المشروع: وهو أداة كيفية ذات معايير محددة من قبل الباحثة لقياس قدرة المعلم على تقديم نموذج لتصميم أحد موضوعات البيولوجي في شكل مشروع قائم على أبعاد الفهم الجمالي والتعليم من أجل التنمية المستدامة، كذلك خطة بحث فعلية لتطبيق ذلك. 3-مقياس تأملي: أداة كيفية ذات ثلاث أسئلة مفتوحة النهاية لتوثيق رأي المعلمين في اشراكهم في بحوث الفعل من خلال البرنامج التدريبي الموجه القائم على الفهم الجمالي والتربية من أجل التنمية المستدامة. 3-مقياس الفهم الجمالي: هو أداة كمية يهدف إلى قياس مدى اكتساب المعلمين لمفاهيم وأبعاد الفهم الجمالي في البيولوجي. 4-مقياس التربية من أجل التنمية المستدامة: أداة كمية يهدف إلى قياس مدى اكتساب المعلمين لمفاهيم وأبعاد التربية من أجل التنمية المستدامة). تم اختيار مجموعة البحث والتي تكونت من (5) معلمين بيولوجي بإحدى المدارس الدولية بمصر، وطبقت الأدوات على مجموعة البحث. وتوصلت نتائج البحث إلى وجود فروق دالة احصائيًا عند مستوى(0.05) بين متوسطي درجات المعلمين في التطبيق القبلي والبعدي لكل من الخريط الذهنية، وكذا مقياس الفهم الجمالي ومقياس التربية من أجل التنمية المستدامة، كما تم تحليل البيانات الخاصة بالأداتين الكيفيتين "نموذج التعلم القام على المشروع" و "المقياس التأملي" تحليلًا وصفيًا كيفيًا وتوصلت الباحثة إلى فعالية البرنامج التدريبي لمعلمي البيولوجي في تحقيق أهداف البرنامج التدريبي. وأوصى البحث بإعادة النظر في برامج إعداد معلمي العلوم/ البيولوجي وإعادة تدريب الطلاب المعلمين، والمعلمين في الخدمة وفق أبعاد الفهم الجمالي والتربية من أجل التنمية المستدامة وكذلك إشراك المعلمين في بحوث الفعل في عديد من التخصصات لما لها من تأثير في الفهم ذو المعنى والمشاركة الفاعلة للمعلمين في تحقيق الأهداف التربوية المطلوبة.
الكلمات الدلالية: الفهم الجمالي، التربية من أجل التنمية المستدامة، بحوث الفعل
التنزيلات
بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.
المراجع
References
Abrams, E.; Middleton, M. & Benson, J. (2009). The development of motivation and academic identity for science learning in early adolescents from indigenous communities. In Proceeding of The National Association for Research in Science Teaching’s Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA, April, pp.17-21.
Anderhag, P. (2017). “Taste for science: A Bourdieu-Pragmatism approach to interest, aesthetics and learning” Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C.& Otrel, K.(Eds.), Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research, Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 3, (pp. 39-52). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0.
Anderhag, P.; Wickman, P. & Hamza, K. (2015). Signs of taste for science: A methodology for studying the constitution of interest in the science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10 (2), pp. 339–368.
Anderson, R. & Helms, J. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v.38, pp.3-16.
Avraamidou, L. (2015). Stories of self and science: Pre-service elementary teachers’ identity wok through time and across contexts. Pedagogies: An International Journal. doi:10.1080/15544 80X.2015.1047837.
Beijaard, D.; Meijer, P. & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teacher and Teacher Education, v. 20, pp.107-128.
Blumstein D. & Saylan, C. (2007). The failure of environmental education and how we can fix it. PLoS Biol, v.5, (5). doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.0050120.
Briscoe, C. & Wells, E. (2002). Reforming primary science assessment practices: A case study of one teachers’ professional development through action research. Science Education, v, 86, pp.417-435.
Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2012). An example of learning about plastics and their evaluation as a contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in secondary school chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, v.13, 93-102.
Dahlin, B. (2001). The primacy of cognition – or of perception? A phenomenological critique of the theoretical bases of science education. In F. Bevilacqua, E. Giannetto & Matthews, M. (Eds.). Science education and culture: The role of history and philosophy of science, pp.129-151. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, v. 35, pp. 425–445.
Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. London: Penguin Books.
Egypt National Review Report for Input to the 2016 HLPF (2016). The Arab Republic of Egypt National Voluntary Review on the Sustainable Development, Input to the 2016 High-level Political Forum (HLPF) on Sustainable Development. Retrieved on: www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org, at: 26/2/2018.
Egypt National Review Report for Input to the 2016 HLPF (2016). The Arab Republic of Egypt National Voluntary Review on the Sustainable Development, Input to the 2016 High-level Political Forum (HLPF) on Sustainable Development. Retrieved on: www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org, at: 26/2/2018.
Eijck, M. & Roth, W. (2007). Improving Science Education for Sustainable Development. PLoS Biology, v. 5 (12), Pp.2763- 2769. Retrieved on: www.plosbiology.org.
El-Zein, Jabbour; Tekce, Zurayk; Nuwayhid, Khawaja; Tell, Al Mooji; De-Jong, Yassin, and Hogan (2014). Health and ecological sustainability in the Arab world: a matter of survival. NCBI. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62338-7.
Fun, C. and Maskat, N. (2010). Teacher-Centered Mind Mapping vs Student-Centered Mind Mapping in the Teaching of Accounting at Pre-U Level – An Action Research, International Conference on Learner Diversity 2010. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, v.7(C), 240–246.
Girod, M. & Wong, D. (2001). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, v.102 (3), pp. 199-224.
Girod, M. (2007). A conceptual overview of the role of beauty and aesthetics in science and science education. Studies in Science Education, v.43 (1), pp.38–61.
Girod, M., Rau, C. & Schepige, A. (2003). “Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: teaching for aesthetic understanding”. Science Education, v. 87, pp.574-587.
Girod, M.; Twyman, T. & Wojcikiewicz, S. (2010). “Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience”. Journal of Science Teacher Education, v.21, pp.801-824.
GMES (2017). Global Monitoring for Environment and Security in Africa -GMES & Africa Ref: HRST/ST/G&A/823/05.17. retrieved on: http://www.oss-online.org/en/global-monitoring-program-environment-security-africa-gmes-africa.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Schulz, R. ( 2017). What Really Makes Secondary School Students “Want” to Study Physics?. Education Science, November, v.7(4), pp. 84-90. doi:10.3390/educsci7040048
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2017). Implication of R.S. Peters’ Notion of Cognitive Perspective and its Implication for Science Education. Educational Philosophical Theory. Retrieved on: www.googlescholar.com. at 28/2/2018.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y.; Kampouropoulou, M. & Fokiali, P. (2015). The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature in School Science Education: How Science Learning Can Help Raise Environmental Awareness. Scientific Research Publishing, Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. Retrieved on: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.68077.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Schulz, R. (2014). Romanticism and Romantic Science: Their contribution to Science Education. Science and Education, v.23, pp.1963-2006.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the value of wonder in Science Education. In Wonder-Full Education: The Century of Wonder in Teaching and Learning across the Curriculum. Egan, K.; Cant, A.; Judson, G. (Edrs) Routledge: New York, NY, USA, pp.40-66.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Stivaktakis, S. (2010). Encouraging Involvement with School Science. Curriculum Pedagogy, v. 5, pp. 138-162.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005). On Humanistic Science Education, ERIC Document, ED506504. Retrieved on: http://files.eric.ed.gov/full-text/ED506504.pdf. at: 28/2/2018.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. and Schulz, R. (2017). “What Really Makes Secondary School Students. Research gate, November. doi:10.3390/educsci7040084.
Hammer, D. & Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of inquiry in teaching and research. Cognition and Instruction, v.19, pp.441-478.
Hidi, S.; Renninger, A. & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational construct that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In Dai, D. & Sternberg, R. (Eds.).Motivation, emotion and cognition, (pp. 99–115), Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Hine, G. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, v. 23 (2): Special Issue.
Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 28, pp.718–727.
Hobbs, L. and Kelly L. (2017). “The Heart of the Educator: Aesthetic Experience Shaping Knowledge, Identity, and Passion”, Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C.& Otrel, K.(Eds.), Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research, Cultural Studies of Science Education, V. 3, (pp. 5-82) Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0.
Hobbs, L. and Kelly L. (2015). “The Heart of the Educator: Aesthetic Experience Shaping Knowledge, Identity, and Passion”, Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C.& Otrel, K.(Eds.), Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 3, (pp. 5-82) Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0.
Hobbs, L. (2013). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers: Locating learning possibilities amid disruption. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 7–28). New York: Routledge.
Holbrook, J. (2009). Meeting challenges to sustainable development through science and technology education. Science Education International, v.20 (1/2), pp. 44-59.
Howitt, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in a holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37 (1), pp.41–58.
Hunsik, K.; Scharmann, L.; Kang, S. & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. Science Education, v.5, pp.383-405.
Jakobson, B. & Wickman, P. (2008). “Art in science class vs. science in art class: a Study in Elementary School. Education & Didactique, v.2 (3), 141–157.
Kagan, S. (2011). “Art and Sustainability. Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity. Lüneburg: Leuphana University.
Klassen, S. & Froese-Klassen, C. (2014). The role of interest in learning science through stories. Interchange, v. 45, pp. 133-151.
Koballa, T. & Glynn, S. (2007). “Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning”. In Abell, S. & Lederman, N. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, (pp. 80-120). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Kraft, N. (2002). “Teacher research as a way to engage in critical reflection: A case study”. Reflective Practicum, v. 3(2), pp.175-189.
Lemake, J. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspective on science education, Journal of research in science teaching, v.38, pp.296-316.
Makrakis, V. & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012). “The challenges of ICTs to online climate change education for sustainable development: The ExConTra learning paradigm”, In S. A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the Middle East - Sustainable Innovation in Education (pp. 594- 605). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
Makrakis, V. (2011). “ICT-enabled education for sustainable development: Merging theory with praxis”, In M. Youssef & S. A. Anwar (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East 2011 ñ in Search for New Paradigms for Re-engineering Education (pp. 410-419), Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
McIntyre, J. & Hobson, A. (2015). Supporting beginner teacher identity development: External mentors and the third space. Research Papers in Education. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2015.1015438.
Metha, R. (2016). Why teachers should care about beauty in science education?. ResearchGate, June, 83-86.
Retrieved on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306013099.
Mezirow, J. (2000). “Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory”, In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as Transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Murphy A. (2014). Integrating Aesthetics into professional development for Teachers of English Learners. TESOL Journal, v. 5 (1), March, pp.82-104.
Neumann, A. (2006). Professing passion: Emotion in the scholarship of professors at research universities. American Educational Research Journal, v.43 (3), 381-424.
Ostergaard, E., Dahlin, B. & Hugo, A. (2008). Doing phenomenology in science education: a research review. Studies in Science Education, v.44 (2), pp.93–121.
Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, v.20 (6), pp.589-605.
Potvin, P. & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude toward science and technology at K-12 Levels: A systemic review of 12 years of educational research. Science Education, v. 50, pp. 85-129.
Pugh, K. & Girod, M. (2007). Science, Art, and Experience: Constructing a Science Pedagogy from Dewey’s Aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, v.18, pp.9-27.
Quay, J. (2013). More than relations between self, others and nature: outdoor education and aesthetic experience. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, v.13 (2), pp.142-157, doi: 10.1080/14729679.2012.746846.
Reason, P. (2007). Education for ecology: Science, aesthetics, spirit and ceremony. Management Learning, v.38 (1), pp. 27-44.
SDSN (2015). Getting Started with Sustainable Development Goals, Concept Note, and OECD 2015, retrieved on: http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/151211-getting-started-guide-FINAL-PDF-.pdf.
Song, Y. (2010). Art in Nature and School. Journal of Aesthetic Education, v.44 (3), pp.96-108.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education. Re-visioning learning and change, Devon: Green Books for the Schumacher Society. Retrieved on: www.books.google.com.eg at 27/2/2018.
Summers, M. & Childs, A. (2007). Student science teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: An empirical study of three postgraduate training cohorts. Science & Technological Education, v.25 (3), pp.307-327.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2014). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Draft international implementation scheme. Retrieved on http://portal. UNESCO.org/education/en/ev.php 26/2/2018.
UNESCO (2012). ESD Sourcebook: Learning & Training Tools, No. 4. Paris, UNESCO. http://unesdoc. unesco.org/images/0021/002163/216383e.pdf.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2004). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Draft international implementation scheme. Retrieved at :December 20, 2017, on: http://portal. UNESCO.org/education/en/ev.php.
Van Zee, E.; Lay, D. & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, v. 87(4), pp.588-612.
Wang, M.; Eccles, J. & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of abilities but lack of choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Psychological Science, v. 2013, pp.1-6.
“Want to Study Physics?”, Education Sciences, November, v.7, pp.84- 95. doi:10.3390/educsci7040084.
Wellington, J. (2003). “Science education for citizenship and a sustainable future”. Pastoral Care in Education, v.21 (30), pp.13-18.
Wickman, P. (2006). Aesthetic Experience in Science Education: Learning and Meaning-Making as Situated Talk and Action, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
Abrams, E.; Middleton, M. & Benson, J. (2009). The development of motivation and academic identity for science learning in early adolescents from indigenous communities. In Proceeding of The National Association for Research in Science Teaching’s Annual Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA, April, pp.17-21.
Anderhag, P. (2017). “Taste for science: A Bourdieu-Pragmatism approach to interest, aesthetics and learning” Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C.& Otrel, K.(Eds.), Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research, Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 3, (pp. 39-52). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0.
Anderhag, P.; Wickman, P. & Hamza, K. (2015). Signs of taste for science: A methodology for studying the constitution of interest in the science classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10 (2), pp. 339–368.
Anderson, R. & Helms, J. (2001). The ideal of standards and the reality of schools: Needed Research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, v.38, pp.3-16.
Avraamidou, L. (2015). Stories of self and science: Pre-service elementary teachers’ identity wok through time and across contexts. Pedagogies: An International Journal. doi:10.1080/15544 80X.2015.1047837.
Beijaard, D.; Meijer, P. & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teacher and Teacher Education, v. 20, pp.107-128.
Blumstein D. & Saylan, C. (2007). The failure of environmental education and how we can fix it. PLoS Biol, v.5, (5). doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.0050120.
Briscoe, C. & Wells, E. (2002). Reforming primary science assessment practices: A case study of one teachers’ professional development through action research. Science Education, v, 86, pp.417-435.
Burmeister, M., & Eilks, I. (2012). An example of learning about plastics and their evaluation as a contribution to Education for Sustainable Development in secondary school chemistry teaching. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, v.13, 93-102.
Dahlin, B. (2001). The primacy of cognition – or of perception? A phenomenological critique of the theoretical bases of science education. In F. Bevilacqua, E. Giannetto & Matthews, M. (Eds.). Science education and culture: The role of history and philosophy of science, pp.129-151. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, v. 35, pp. 425–445.
Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. London: Penguin Books.
Egypt National Review Report for Input to the 2016 HLPF (2016). The Arab Republic of Egypt National Voluntary Review on the Sustainable Development, Input to the 2016 High-level Political Forum (HLPF) on Sustainable Development. Retrieved on: www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org, at: 26/2/2018.
Egypt National Review Report for Input to the 2016 HLPF (2016). The Arab Republic of Egypt National Voluntary Review on the Sustainable Development, Input to the 2016 High-level Political Forum (HLPF) on Sustainable Development. Retrieved on: www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org, at: 26/2/2018.
Eijck, M. & Roth, W. (2007). Improving Science Education for Sustainable Development. PLoS Biology, v. 5 (12), Pp.2763- 2769. Retrieved on: www.plosbiology.org.
El-Zein, Jabbour; Tekce, Zurayk; Nuwayhid, Khawaja; Tell, Al Mooji; De-Jong, Yassin, and Hogan (2014). Health and ecological sustainability in the Arab world: a matter of survival. NCBI. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62338-7.
Fun, C. and Maskat, N. (2010). Teacher-Centered Mind Mapping vs Student-Centered Mind Mapping in the Teaching of Accounting at Pre-U Level – An Action Research, International Conference on Learner Diversity 2010. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, v.7(C), 240–246.
Girod, M. & Wong, D. (2001). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, v.102 (3), pp. 199-224.
Girod, M. (2007). A conceptual overview of the role of beauty and aesthetics in science and science education. Studies in Science Education, v.43 (1), pp.38–61.
Girod, M., Rau, C. & Schepige, A. (2003). “Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: teaching for aesthetic understanding”. Science Education, v. 87, pp.574-587.
Girod, M.; Twyman, T. & Wojcikiewicz, S. (2010). “Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience”. Journal of Science Teacher Education, v.21, pp.801-824.
GMES (2017). Global Monitoring for Environment and Security in Africa -GMES & Africa Ref: HRST/ST/G&A/823/05.17. retrieved on: http://www.oss-online.org/en/global-monitoring-program-environment-security-africa-gmes-africa.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Schulz, R. ( 2017). What Really Makes Secondary School Students “Want” to Study Physics?. Education Science, November, v.7(4), pp. 84-90. doi:10.3390/educsci7040048
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2017). Implication of R.S. Peters’ Notion of Cognitive Perspective and its Implication for Science Education. Educational Philosophical Theory. Retrieved on: www.googlescholar.com. at 28/2/2018.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y.; Kampouropoulou, M. & Fokiali, P. (2015). The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature in School Science Education: How Science Learning Can Help Raise Environmental Awareness. Scientific Research Publishing, Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. Retrieved on: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.68077.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Schulz, R. (2014). Romanticism and Romantic Science: Their contribution to Science Education. Science and Education, v.23, pp.1963-2006.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2014). Reclaiming the value of wonder in Science Education. In Wonder-Full Education: The Century of Wonder in Teaching and Learning across the Curriculum. Egan, K.; Cant, A.; Judson, G. (Edrs) Routledge: New York, NY, USA, pp.40-66.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. & Stivaktakis, S. (2010). Encouraging Involvement with School Science. Curriculum Pedagogy, v. 5, pp. 138-162.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005). On Humanistic Science Education, ERIC Document, ED506504. Retrieved on: http://files.eric.ed.gov/full-text/ED506504.pdf. at: 28/2/2018.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. and Schulz, R. (2017). “What Really Makes Secondary School Students. Research gate, November. doi:10.3390/educsci7040084.
Hammer, D. & Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of inquiry in teaching and research. Cognition and Instruction, v.19, pp.441-478.
Hidi, S.; Renninger, A. & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational construct that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In Dai, D. & Sternberg, R. (Eds.).Motivation, emotion and cognition, (pp. 99–115), Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Hine, G. (2013). The importance of action research in teacher education programs. Issues in Educational Research, v. 23 (2): Special Issue.
Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, v. 28, pp.718–727.
Hobbs, L. and Kelly L. (2017). “The Heart of the Educator: Aesthetic Experience Shaping Knowledge, Identity, and Passion”, Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C.& Otrel, K.(Eds.), Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research, Cultural Studies of Science Education, V. 3, (pp. 5-82) Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0.
Hobbs, L. and Kelly L. (2015). “The Heart of the Educator: Aesthetic Experience Shaping Knowledge, Identity, and Passion”, Bellocchi, A., Quigley, C.& Otrel, K.(Eds.), Exploring Emotions, Aesthetics and Wellbeing in Science Education Research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, v. 3, (pp. 5-82) Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43353-0.
Hobbs, L. (2013). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers: Locating learning possibilities amid disruption. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 7–28). New York: Routledge.
Holbrook, J. (2009). Meeting challenges to sustainable development through science and technology education. Science Education International, v.20 (1/2), pp. 44-59.
Howitt, C. (2007). Pre-service elementary teachers’ perceptions of factors in a holistic methods course influencing their confidence in teaching science. Research in Science Education, 37 (1), pp.41–58.
Hunsik, K.; Scharmann, L.; Kang, S. & Noh, T. (2010). Cognitive conflict and situational interest as factors influencing conceptual change. Science Education, v.5, pp.383-405.
Jakobson, B. & Wickman, P. (2008). “Art in science class vs. science in art class: a Study in Elementary School. Education & Didactique, v.2 (3), 141–157.
Kagan, S. (2011). “Art and Sustainability. Connecting Patterns for a Culture of Complexity. Lüneburg: Leuphana University.
Klassen, S. & Froese-Klassen, C. (2014). The role of interest in learning science through stories. Interchange, v. 45, pp. 133-151.
Koballa, T. & Glynn, S. (2007). “Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning”. In Abell, S. & Lederman, N. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, (pp. 80-120). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
Kraft, N. (2002). “Teacher research as a way to engage in critical reflection: A case study”. Reflective Practicum, v. 3(2), pp.175-189.
Lemake, J. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspective on science education, Journal of research in science teaching, v.38, pp.296-316.
Makrakis, V. & Kostoulas-Makrakis, N. (2012). “The challenges of ICTs to online climate change education for sustainable development: The ExConTra learning paradigm”, In S. A. Anwar (Ed.), Proceedings of the 5th Conference on eLearning Excellence in the Middle East - Sustainable Innovation in Education (pp. 594- 605). Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
Makrakis, V. (2011). “ICT-enabled education for sustainable development: Merging theory with praxis”, In M. Youssef & S. A. Anwar (Eds.). Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference on e-Learning Excellence in the Middle East 2011 ñ in Search for New Paradigms for Re-engineering Education (pp. 410-419), Dubai, UAE: Hamdan Bin Mohammed e-University.
McIntyre, J. & Hobson, A. (2015). Supporting beginner teacher identity development: External mentors and the third space. Research Papers in Education. doi: 10.1080/02671522.2015.1015438.
Metha, R. (2016). Why teachers should care about beauty in science education?. ResearchGate, June, 83-86.
Retrieved on: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306013099.
Mezirow, J. (2000). “Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory”, In J. Mezirow & Associates (Eds.), Learning as Transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Murphy A. (2014). Integrating Aesthetics into professional development for Teachers of English Learners. TESOL Journal, v. 5 (1), March, pp.82-104.
Neumann, A. (2006). Professing passion: Emotion in the scholarship of professors at research universities. American Educational Research Journal, v.43 (3), 381-424.
Ostergaard, E., Dahlin, B. & Hugo, A. (2008). Doing phenomenology in science education: a research review. Studies in Science Education, v.44 (2), pp.93–121.
Ponte, P., Ax, J., Beijaard, D., & Wubbels, T. (2004). Teachers’ development of professional knowledge through action research and the facilitation of this by teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, v.20 (6), pp.589-605.
Potvin, P. & Hasni, A. (2014). Interest, motivation and attitude toward science and technology at K-12 Levels: A systemic review of 12 years of educational research. Science Education, v. 50, pp. 85-129.
Pugh, K. & Girod, M. (2007). Science, Art, and Experience: Constructing a Science Pedagogy from Dewey’s Aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, v.18, pp.9-27.
Quay, J. (2013). More than relations between self, others and nature: outdoor education and aesthetic experience. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, v.13 (2), pp.142-157, doi: 10.1080/14729679.2012.746846.
Reason, P. (2007). Education for ecology: Science, aesthetics, spirit and ceremony. Management Learning, v.38 (1), pp. 27-44.
SDSN (2015). Getting Started with Sustainable Development Goals, Concept Note, and OECD 2015, retrieved on: http://unsdsn.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/151211-getting-started-guide-FINAL-PDF-.pdf.
Song, Y. (2010). Art in Nature and School. Journal of Aesthetic Education, v.44 (3), pp.96-108.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education. Re-visioning learning and change, Devon: Green Books for the Schumacher Society. Retrieved on: www.books.google.com.eg at 27/2/2018.
Summers, M. & Childs, A. (2007). Student science teachers’ conceptions of sustainable development: An empirical study of three postgraduate training cohorts. Science & Technological Education, v.25 (3), pp.307-327.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2014). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Draft international implementation scheme. Retrieved on http://portal. UNESCO.org/education/en/ev.php 26/2/2018.
UNESCO (2012). ESD Sourcebook: Learning & Training Tools, No. 4. Paris, UNESCO. http://unesdoc. unesco.org/images/0021/002163/216383e.pdf.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2004). United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: Draft international implementation scheme. Retrieved at :December 20, 2017, on: http://portal. UNESCO.org/education/en/ev.php.
Van Zee, E.; Lay, D. & Roberts, D. (2003). Fostering collaborative inquiries by prospective and practicing elementary and middle school teachers. Science Education, v. 87(4), pp.588-612.
Wang, M.; Eccles, J. & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of abilities but lack of choice: Individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Psychological Science, v. 2013, pp.1-6.
“Want to Study Physics?”, Education Sciences, November, v.7, pp.84- 95. doi:10.3390/educsci7040084.
Wellington, J. (2003). “Science education for citizenship and a sustainable future”. Pastoral Care in Education, v.21 (30), pp.13-18.
Wickman, P. (2006). Aesthetic Experience in Science Education: Learning and Meaning-Making as Situated Talk and Action, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
منشور
2019-03-03
كيفية الاقتباس
Abuzied, A. (2019). فاعلية برنامج تدريبي موجه قائم على بحوث الفعل لتنمية الفهم الجمالي و متطلبات التعليم من أجل التنمية المستدامة لدى معلمي البيولوجي بالمرحلة الثانوية. المجلة الدولية للبحوث في العلوم التربوية, 2(2), 343 - 401. استرجع في من http://www.iafh.net/index.php/IJRES/article/view/110
القسم
البحوث
الحقوق الفكرية (c) 2019 Amany M Abuzied
هذا العمل مرخص حسب الرخصة Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC
Creative Commons Rights Expression Language (CC REL)
